|
Project Overview
.
.
3) Create new Law:
The third
piece of this action plan is to do an end-run on
the fundamentalist Christians by creating a completely new and
separate set of secular laws. The plan is to create a
separate, independent law for each right being
demanded.
Some critics of the process
described below will say, "We already have the domestic
partner laws. They provide what we need."
Unfortunately, that's not the case.
We are not talking about a
rehash of an old, obsolete, one-size-fits-all, take-all-or-nothing,
set of marriage and
family rules set up by lawyers and for lawyers. The "Legal Human Rights Package." is designed to be
quite different. The process is outlined below:
a) Examine the
marriage and family laws by which heterosexuals agree to be bound when
they sign a marriage license. (The signers are agreeing to be
bound by a huge set of government/lawyer-created laws -- laws about
which they know nothing.)
b) Take all
the desirable aspects from existing marriage codes and put them one by
one into a separate packages. Create each piece as a
separate and distinct law that stands by itself. For
convenience, these laws will ( in this proposal and for the present
cycle) be collectively called the "Legal
Human Rights Package."
c)
Because marriage and family laws were written by lawyers, to the
advantage of lawyers, and to serve lawyers, and to make money for
lawyers, carefully examine the laws you want and leave out
anything that does not serve the partners, themselves.
d) Now that we
have at lease a partial list of clear specific, tangible, doable objectives, decide which
specific, proposed law to start with.
d) Look for the
opposition's weakest point. Find something: 1) that will
trigger strong emotional support, 2) that will generate strong support and/or
participation from the heterosexual community, and 3) something
that will not cost anybody any money.
Hospital visitation rights are probably the best place to
start. Why? Because millions of
heterosexual couples who are living together but are not legally married
would also like to have this right.
e) Draft
legislation granting this right to all who choose to sign up for it,
and
then go all out to get the law passed in every local, state and federal
legislature. Write the law in simple, direct, straight
forward, easy-to-read, and easy-to-understand understand language. Use short
sentences. Write the entire law with as few words as possible.
AVOID LEGALESE!
Intention is another important
factor that is absent in the present laws. Each law shall
have two equally powerful
parts -- the letter of
those rules and the intention
behind that stated rules.
A violation of a rule's
intention shall be equal to a
violation of the letter of that rule.
Avoid allowing anything that is not directly related to the letter
and intention of a particular law to be attached to it. As part of the
law add
a sentence that says, any amendment attached to this bill that is not germane (directly
related) to the letter and intention of this legislation shall cause the proposed
amendment to the bill to become null and void.
This proposed law gives everybody, gays, lesbians, heterosexual, the
young, the old, including the widowed elderly, a common ground to stand
on. Who in their right mind is going to oppose a secular law
allowing your widowed grandmother to determine who has the right to
visit her in the hospital?
f) Once
hospital visitation rights become law, then select the next
easiest-to-pass aspect and repeat the process. Propose laws
that make no reference to the word marriage. Propose laws
that in essence say that what two people do in their private lives is
their own business. Address only the legal rights issues.
Present-day marriage contracts
are all-or-nothing packages. The are written in legalese by lawyers and for
lawyers. This is a major down-side for many
people. On the other hand, our new approach will allow
people the option of choosing which aspects of the Legal Human Rights Package that they want to have for themselves
and it will allow them to reject all the parts that they don't
want.
For an example of carefully setting up
the laws for the interest of the governed and not the interest of the
lawyers, see the section on Retirement trust Funds.˛
.
|